MARASCHINO CHERRIES vs SPICY CANDIED KUMQUATS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SPICY CANDIED KUMQUATS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
MARASCHINO CHERRIES: 0
vs
SPICY CANDIED KUMQUATS: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARASCHINO CHERRIES | SPICY CANDIED KUMQUATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 167 cal | 133 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 33.3 g | 33.3 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARASCHINO CHERRIES | SPICY CANDIED KUMQUATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARASCHINO CHERRIES | SPICY CANDIED KUMQUATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 233 MG |