MAPLE FLAVORED PORK LINKS vs SMITHFIELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SMITHFIELD wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
MAPLE FLAVORED PORK LINKS: 2
vs
SMITHFIELD: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MAPLE FLAVORED PORK LINKS | SMITHFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 345 cal | 316 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 11.4 g | |
| Carbs | 7.3 g | 3.8 g | |
| Fat | 25.5 g | 27.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MAPLE FLAVORED PORK LINKS | SMITHFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MAPLE FLAVORED PORK LINKS | SMITHFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 51 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 818 MG | 1,025 MG |