MAPLE COOKIE THINS vs FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MAPLE COOKIE THINS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
MAPLE COOKIE THINS: 6
vs
FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MAPLE COOKIE THINS | FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 514 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 2.7 g | |
| Carbs | 60 g | 67.6 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 24.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MAPLE COOKIE THINS | FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MAPLE COOKIE THINS | FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 27 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1 MG | 4.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 450 MG | 284 MG |