MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS vs WISCONSIN STYLE BRATWURST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WISCONSIN STYLE BRATWURST wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS: 3
vs
WISCONSIN STYLE BRATWURST: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | WISCONSIN STYLE BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 257 cal | |
| Protein | 13.0 g | 16.8 g | |
| Carbs | 3.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 29.6 g | 21.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | WISCONSIN STYLE BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | WISCONSIN STYLE BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 74 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 815 MG | 726 MG |