MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS vs PORK SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PORK SAUSAGE wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS: 1
vs
PORK SAUSAGE: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | PORK SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 309 cal | |
| Protein | 13.0 g | 18.2 g | |
| Carbs | 3.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 29.6 g | 23.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | PORK SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MAPLE COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | PORK SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 74 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 2.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 127 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 815 MG | 1,018 MG |