MAPLE APPLE CIDER VINAIGRETTE DRESSING vs ITALIAN DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ITALIAN DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
MAPLE APPLE CIDER VINAIGRETTE DRESSING: 0
vs
ITALIAN DRESSING: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MAPLE APPLE CIDER VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 83 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 10 g | 10 g | Tie |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MAPLE APPLE CIDER VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MAPLE APPLE CIDER VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 100 MG | 1,167 MG |