MAPLE & ALMOND SWEET POTATOES vs TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS wins in 8 out of 12 nutrient categories
MAPLE & ALMOND SWEET POTATOES: 2
vs
TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS: 8
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MAPLE & ALMOND SWEET POTATOES | TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 136 cal | 105 cal | |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 6.1 g | |
| Carbs | 22.1 g | 10.5 g | |
| Fat | 5 g | 4.4 g | |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MAPLE & ALMOND SWEET POTATOES | TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 5.3 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MAPLE & ALMOND SWEET POTATOES | TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 88 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 229 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 64 MG | 202 MG |