MANDARIN ORANGE PLANT-BASED CRISPY CHICK'N vs CLASSIC CHICK'N TENDERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC CHICK'N TENDERS wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
MANDARIN ORANGE PLANT-BASED CRISPY CHICK'N: 2
vs
CLASSIC CHICK'N TENDERS: 8
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MANDARIN ORANGE PLANT-BASED CRISPY CHICK'N | CLASSIC CHICK'N TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 186 cal | 262 cal | |
| Protein | 9.3 g | 17.5 g | |
| Carbs | 25.7 g | 23.8 g | |
| Fat | 5 g | 11.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 6.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MANDARIN ORANGE PLANT-BASED CRISPY CHICK'N | CLASSIC CHICK'N TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MANDARIN ORANGE PLANT-BASED CRISPY CHICK'N | CLASSIC CHICK'N TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 21 MG | 50 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 4.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 238 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 421 MG | 600 MG |