MADISON STREET vs SCHALLER & WEBER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SCHALLER & WEBER wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
MADISON STREET: 1
vs
SCHALLER & WEBER: 2
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MADISON STREET | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 100 cal | 43 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 20 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MADISON STREET | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MADISON STREET | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 2,400 MG | 857 MG |