MACKINAC ISLAND CHICAGO BLEND CORN vs ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALMONDS wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
MACKINAC ISLAND CHICAGO BLEND CORN: 3
vs
ALMONDS: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MACKINAC ISLAND CHICAGO BLEND CORN | ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 386 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 64.9 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fat | 14.0 g | 46.4 g | |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 10.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MACKINAC ISLAND CHICAGO BLEND CORN | ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MACKINAC ISLAND CHICAGO BLEND CORN | ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 286 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 0 MG | 214 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 571 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 526 MG | 304 MG |