MACKEREL FILLET vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACKEREL FILLET wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
MACKEREL FILLET: 4
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MACKEREL FILLET | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 145 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MACKEREL FILLET | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MACKEREL FILLET | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 364 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 9.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 364 MG | 357 MG |