MACADAMIAS COATED WITH PREMIUM MILK CHOCOLATE vs EMERALD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMERALD wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
MACADAMIAS COATED WITH PREMIUM MILK CHOCOLATE: 3
vs
EMERALD: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MACADAMIAS COATED WITH PREMIUM MILK CHOCOLATE | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 564 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 17.1 g | |
| Carbs | 51.3 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fat | 38.5 g | 45.7 g | |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 5.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MACADAMIAS COATED WITH PREMIUM MILK CHOCOLATE | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MACADAMIAS COATED WITH PREMIUM MILK CHOCOLATE | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 103 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 6.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 51 MG | 543 MG |