MACADAMIA WHITE CHOCOLATE vs CINNAMON GRAHAM CRACKERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CINNAMON GRAHAM CRACKERS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
MACADAMIA WHITE CHOCOLATE: 3
vs
CINNAMON GRAHAM CRACKERS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MACADAMIA WHITE CHOCOLATE | CINNAMON GRAHAM CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 419 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 6.5 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 77.4 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 11.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MACADAMIA WHITE CHOCOLATE | CINNAMON GRAHAM CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MACADAMIA WHITE CHOCOLATE | CINNAMON GRAHAM CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 48 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 177 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 196 MG | 371 MG |