LUNDS & BYERLYS vs OATMEAL RAISIN SMALL-BATCH COOKIES FROM SCRATCH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OATMEAL RAISIN SMALL-BATCH COOKIES FROM SCRATCH wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 3
vs
OATMEAL RAISIN SMALL-BATCH COOKIES FROM SCRATCH: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | OATMEAL RAISIN SMALL-BATCH COOKIES FROM SCRATCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 429 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 62.5 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | OATMEAL RAISIN SMALL-BATCH COOKIES FROM SCRATCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | OATMEAL RAISIN SMALL-BATCH COOKIES FROM SCRATCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 321 MG | 125 MG |