LUNDS & BYERLYS vs NATURAL DECADENCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL DECADENCE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 3
vs
NATURAL DECADENCE: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 211 cal | |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 5.3 g | |
| Carbs | 42.5 g | 26.3 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 10.5 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 70 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 375 MG | 105 MG |