LUNDS & BYERLYS vs DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED FORTUNE COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
vs
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED FORTUNE COOKIES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED FORTUNE COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 379 cal | 438 cal | |
| Protein | 5.2 g | 6.3 g | |
| Carbs | 58.6 g | 71.9 g | |
| Fat | 13.8 g | 18.8 g | |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 6.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED FORTUNE COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED FORTUNE COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 310 MG | 0 MG |