LUNDS & BYERLYS vs MINI CHOCOLATE COVERED CHOCOLATE NUGGETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
vs
MINI CHOCOLATE COVERED CHOCOLATE NUGGETS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MINI CHOCOLATE COVERED CHOCOLATE NUGGETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 46.4 g | 67.9 g | |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MINI CHOCOLATE COVERED CHOCOLATE NUGGETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MINI CHOCOLATE COVERED CHOCOLATE NUGGETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,107 MG | 107 MG |