LUNDS & BYERLYS vs CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
vs
CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 560 cal | 406 cal | |
| Protein | 8 g | 6.3 g | |
| Carbs | 52 g | 56.3 g | |
| Fat | 36 g | 18.8 g | |
| Fiber | 4 g | 3.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 160 MG | 94 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.2 MG | 3.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 225 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 40 MG | 78 MG |