LUNDS & BYERLYS vs MINI FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
vs
MINI FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MINI FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 70 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MINI FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MINI FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 357 MG | 300 MG |