LUNDS & BYERLYS vs FROSTED THUMBPRINT COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 4 out of 12 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
vs
FROSTED THUMBPRINT COOKIES: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | FROSTED THUMBPRINT COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 545 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 3.0 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 78.8 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 27.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | FROSTED THUMBPRINT COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | FROSTED THUMBPRINT COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 357 MG | 485 MG |