LUNDS & BYERLYS vs CHOCOLATE MINI BEAR BAKED GRAHAM SNACKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOLATE MINI BEAR BAKED GRAHAM SNACKS wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 3
vs
CHOCOLATE MINI BEAR BAKED GRAHAM SNACKS: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CHOCOLATE MINI BEAR BAKED GRAHAM SNACKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 483 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 6.9 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 72.4 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CHOCOLATE MINI BEAR BAKED GRAHAM SNACKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CHOCOLATE MINI BEAR BAKED GRAHAM SNACKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 34 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 4.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 276 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 357 MG | 362 MG |