LUNDS & BYERLYS vs KINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
vs
KINGS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | KINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 594 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 15.6 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 31.3 g | 78.6 g | |
| Fat | 46.9 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | KINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | KINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 31 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 6.2 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 16 MG | 339 MG |