LUNDS & BYERLYS vs HAMAKUA MACADAMIA NUT COMPANY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
vs
HAMAKUA MACADAMIA NUT COMPANY: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | HAMAKUA MACADAMIA NUT COMPANY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 594 cal | 714 cal | |
| Protein | 15.6 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 31.3 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fat | 46.9 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | HAMAKUA MACADAMIA NUT COMPANY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | HAMAKUA MACADAMIA NUT COMPANY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 31 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 6.2 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 16 MG | 196 MG |