LUNDS & BYERLYS vs SQUEEZE&GO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
vs
SQUEEZE&GO: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | SQUEEZE&GO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 325 cal | 50 cal | |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 77.5 g | 14.4 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 5 g | 2.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | SQUEEZE&GO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 66.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | SQUEEZE&GO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 25 MG | 0 MG |