LUNDS & BYERLYS vs MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 6
vs
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 615 cal | 550 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 18.0 g | 47.5 g | |
| Fat | 56.4 g | 35 g | |
| Fiber | 10.3 g | 5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 256 MG | 200 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.2 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 333 MG | 50 MG |