LUNDS & BYERLYS vs ANIMAL COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
vs
ANIMAL COOKIES: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ANIMAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 411 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 53.6 g | 73.3 g | |
| Fat | 19.6 g | 15 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ANIMAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ANIMAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 16 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 73 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 268 MG | 300 MG |