LUNDS & BYERLYS vs THE ORIGINAL BELGIAN ALMOND THINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
THE ORIGINAL BELGIAN ALMOND THINS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
vs
THE ORIGINAL BELGIAN ALMOND THINS: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | THE ORIGINAL BELGIAN ALMOND THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 396 cal | 477 cal | |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 58.3 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 14.6 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | THE ORIGINAL BELGIAN ALMOND THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | THE ORIGINAL BELGIAN ALMOND THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 83 MG | 33 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 312 MG | 577 MG |