LUNDS & BYERLYS vs FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
vs
FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 478 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 4.4 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 69.6 g | |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 21.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 286 MG | 348 MG |