LUNDS & BYERLYS vs COLONIAL ASSORTMENT
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COLONIAL ASSORTMENT wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 2
vs
COLONIAL ASSORTMENT: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | COLONIAL ASSORTMENT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 450 cal | 441 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 5.9 g | |
| Carbs | 55 g | 61.8 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 23.5 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | COLONIAL ASSORTMENT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | COLONIAL ASSORTMENT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 100 MG | 59 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 75 MG | 88 MG |