LUNDS & BYERLYS vs COCONUT ALMOND COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COCONUT ALMOND COOKIES wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 3
vs
COCONUT ALMOND COOKIES: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | COCONUT ALMOND COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 448 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 64.3 g | 58.6 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 24.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | COCONUT ALMOND COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | COCONUT ALMOND COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 38 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 41 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 321 MG | 483 MG |