LUNDS & BYERLYS vs YEE-HAW PICKLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
vs
YEE-HAW PICKLE: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | YEE-HAW PICKLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 155 cal | 18 cal | |
| Protein | 10.2 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.4 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 12.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | YEE-HAW PICKLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.7 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | YEE-HAW PICKLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 42 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 288 MG | 400 MG |