LUNDS & BYERLYS vs ALMOND PIGNOLI COOKIE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALMOND PIGNOLI COOKIE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 3
vs
ALMOND PIGNOLI COOKIE: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ALMOND PIGNOLI COOKIE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 406 cal | 545 cal | |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 13.6 g | |
| Carbs | 59.4 g | 31.8 g | |
| Fat | 15.6 g | 43.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 9.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ALMOND PIGNOLI COOKIE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ALMOND PIGNOLI COOKIE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 62 MG | 236 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 2.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 328 MG | 227 MG |