LUNDS & BYERLYS vs R.L. ALBERT & SON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
vs
R.L. ALBERT & SON: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | R.L. ALBERT & SON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 75 g | 100 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | R.L. ALBERT & SON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | R.L. ALBERT & SON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 25 MG | 0 MG |