LUNDS & BYERLYS vs TRADITIONAL TEATIME SHORTBREAD COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
vs
TRADITIONAL TEATIME SHORTBREAD COOKIES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | TRADITIONAL TEATIME SHORTBREAD COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 411 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 5 g | |
| Carbs | 58.9 g | 55 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | TRADITIONAL TEATIME SHORTBREAD COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | TRADITIONAL TEATIME SHORTBREAD COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 339 MG | 175 MG |