LUNDS & BYERLYS vs SOURDOUGH THINS PRETZELS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOURDOUGH THINS PRETZELS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 3
vs
SOURDOUGH THINS PRETZELS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | SOURDOUGH THINS PRETZELS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 472 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 58.3 g | 82.1 g | |
| Fat | 27.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 5.6 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | SOURDOUGH THINS PRETZELS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | SOURDOUGH THINS PRETZELS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 111 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 28 MG | 1,893 MG |