LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS vs RIPPLE CUT SWEET POTATO CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS wins in 9 out of 15 nutrient categories
LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS: 9
vs
RIPPLE CUT SWEET POTATO CHIPS: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS | RIPPLE CUT SWEET POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 393 cal | 565 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 82.1 g | 56.5 g | |
| Fat | 5.4 g | 35.3 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS | RIPPLE CUT SWEET POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 214 UG | 0 UG | |
| Niacin | 7.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 31.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS | RIPPLE CUT SWEET POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 6.4 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 1,131 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 607 MG | 230 MG |