LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS vs CLASSIC POTATO CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS wins in 8 out of 15 nutrient categories
LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS: 8
vs
CLASSIC POTATO CHIPS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS | CLASSIC POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 393 cal | 536 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 7.1 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 82.1 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 5.4 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS | CLASSIC POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 214 UG | 0 UG | |
| Niacin | 7.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS | CLASSIC POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 6.4 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 1,296 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 607 MG | 196 MG |