LOW FAT RANCH SALAD DRESSING vs BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LOW FAT RANCH SALAD DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
LOW FAT RANCH SALAD DRESSING: 4
vs
BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOW FAT RANCH SALAD DRESSING | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 117 cal | 194 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.2 g | |
| Carbs | 10 g | 6.5 g | |
| Fat | 5 g | 19.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOW FAT RANCH SALAD DRESSING | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOW FAT RANCH SALAD DRESSING | BUTTERMILK RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 700 MG | 710 MG |