LOW FAT MILK vs COBURG
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LOW FAT MILK wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
LOW FAT MILK: 4
vs
COBURG: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOW FAT MILK | COBURG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 50 cal | 62 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 4.6 g | 5 g | |
| Fat | 1.0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOW FAT MILK | COBURG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.5 MG | 1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOW FAT MILK | COBURG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 125 MG | 125 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 162 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 50 MG | 96 MG |