LOW FAT BIG FRANKS VEGAN HOT DOGS vs TRADITIONAL POLISH SEASONED
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LOW FAT BIG FRANKS VEGAN HOT DOGS wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
LOW FAT BIG FRANKS VEGAN HOT DOGS: 6
vs
TRADITIONAL POLISH SEASONED: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOW FAT BIG FRANKS VEGAN HOT DOGS | TRADITIONAL POLISH SEASONED | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 157 cal | 268 cal | |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 5.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 4.9 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOW FAT BIG FRANKS VEGAN HOT DOGS | TRADITIONAL POLISH SEASONED | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOW FAT BIG FRANKS VEGAN HOT DOGS | TRADITIONAL POLISH SEASONED | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 92 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 471 MG | 821 MG |