LONG LASTING SOUR vs GIANT MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GIANT MARSHMALLOWS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
LONG LASTING SOUR: 0
vs
GIANT MARSHMALLOWS: 5
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LONG LASTING SOUR | GIANT MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 88 g | 82.1 g | |
| Fat | 4 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LONG LASTING SOUR | GIANT MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LONG LASTING SOUR | GIANT MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 54 MG |