LONG GROVE CONFECTIONERY CO. vs BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LONG GROVE CONFECTIONERY CO.: 3
vs
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LONG GROVE CONFECTIONERY CO. | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 545 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 9.1 g | |
| Carbs | 68.4 g | 54.6 g | |
| Fat | 26.3 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 5.3 g | 6.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LONG GROVE CONFECTIONERY CO. | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LONG GROVE CONFECTIONERY CO. | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 61 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 5.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 171 MG | 0 MG |