LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR vs COOKED SHRIMP RING WITH COCKTAIL SAUCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP RING WITH COCKTAIL SAUCE wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR: 2
vs
COOKED SHRIMP RING WITH COCKTAIL SAUCE: 8
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR | COOKED SHRIMP RING WITH COCKTAIL SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 184 cal | 144 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 24.7 g | |
| Carbs | 28.3 g | 6.2 g | |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 0.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR | COOKED SHRIMP RING WITH COCKTAIL SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR | COOKED SHRIMP RING WITH COCKTAIL SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 39 MG | 62 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 171 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 414 MG | 931 MG |