LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR vs BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN POCKETS SPICY BUFFALO-STYLE IN A TOASTED CRUST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR: 5
vs
BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN POCKETS SPICY BUFFALO-STYLE IN A TOASTED CRUST: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR | BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN POCKETS SPICY BUFFALO-STYLE IN A TOASTED CRUST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 184 cal | 265 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 28.3 g | 31.9 g | |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 12.4 g | |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 3.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR | BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN POCKETS SPICY BUFFALO-STYLE IN A TOASTED CRUST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR | BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN POCKETS SPICY BUFFALO-STYLE IN A TOASTED CRUST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 39 MG | 177 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 171 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 414 MG | 513 MG |