LITEHOUSE vs CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LITEHOUSE: 0
vs
CAESAR DRESSING: 5
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LITEHOUSE | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 465 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 4.7 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 48.8 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LITEHOUSE | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LITEHOUSE | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 581 MG | 1,067 MG |