LITE SPARKLING vs MAXWELL HOUSE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LITE SPARKLING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
LITE SPARKLING: 3
vs
MAXWELL HOUSE: 0
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LITE SPARKLING | MAXWELL HOUSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 7 cal | 366 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 2.0 g | 97.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LITE SPARKLING | MAXWELL HOUSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LITE SPARKLING | MAXWELL HOUSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 13 MG | 0 MG |