LITE ITALIAN REDUCED FAT DRESSING vs RED JALAPENO CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LITE ITALIAN REDUCED FAT DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
LITE ITALIAN REDUCED FAT DRESSING: 3
vs
RED JALAPENO CAESAR DRESSING: 1
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LITE ITALIAN REDUCED FAT DRESSING | RED JALAPENO CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 167 cal | 483 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 10 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 15 g | 51.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LITE ITALIAN REDUCED FAT DRESSING | RED JALAPENO CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LITE ITALIAN REDUCED FAT DRESSING | RED JALAPENO CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 690 MG |