LIGHT SPONGE CANDY vs RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LIGHT SPONGE CANDY wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
LIGHT SPONGE CANDY: 6
vs
RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LIGHT SPONGE CANDY | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 83.3 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 11.7 g | 35 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LIGHT SPONGE CANDY | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LIGHT SPONGE CANDY | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 140 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 217 MG | 100 MG |