LIGHT CHAMPAGNE DRESSING vs BALSAMIC GLAZE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LIGHT CHAMPAGNE DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
LIGHT CHAMPAGNE DRESSING: 3
vs
BALSAMIC GLAZE: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LIGHT CHAMPAGNE DRESSING | BALSAMIC GLAZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 194 cal | 236 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 1 g | |
| Carbs | 6.5 g | 56 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LIGHT CHAMPAGNE DRESSING | BALSAMIC GLAZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LIGHT CHAMPAGNE DRESSING | BALSAMIC GLAZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,516 MG | 47 MG |