LEE KUM KEE vs DIETZ & WATSON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LEE KUM KEE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
LEE KUM KEE: 4
vs
DIETZ & WATSON: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LEE KUM KEE | DIETZ & WATSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 238 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 59.5 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 30 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LEE KUM KEE | DIETZ & WATSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LEE KUM KEE | DIETZ & WATSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 2,524 MG | 600 MG |